In an article of Gamal Nkrumah (Remaking
history, Al-Ahram Weekly, 14-20 May 2009), opinions of Armenian
diplomats are reflected with some comments. When some opinions are given as if
they were real facts, opposite arguments should also accompany at the same
level, but not just pass of in saying that those opinions are denied .
Otherwise, truth cannot be known.
If the Ottoman
Empire had applied genocidal policy to Armenians, they could not
have survived. There are a lot of examples in history, e.g. the Indians of
especially South America and may be of North America .
Is there any nation which disappeared while being subject to the Ottoman Empire ?
The case is simple. The British
Empire spread all the lies even before World War I to speed up the collapse of
the Ottoman Empire . When Armenians started to
kill Turks in Eastern Anatolia, backed up especially by Britain and France , the empire forced them to
migrate after a law enacted as a result of war conditions. Not only Ottomans, many
other countries enacted such laws. Defining a tragedy as “genocide” needs some evidence
as proof.
History proves the opposite. All
staff thought to be responsible for the deaths during migration were punished
by the empire, many of them sentenced to death. All the lists of migrated and
returned Armenians were kept, which can be found in the US archives. Anyone
familiar with the issue would notice that Armenians refuse all Turkish offers
of doing research in the archives. Who can be afraid of archives other than who
is afraid of the truth?
I still hope that one day, sensible
Armenians will see that nothing based on lies can bring happiness, and will
together with Turks, remember the victims of the tragedies during the war, both
Turks and Armenians.
For Al-Ahram Weekly, May 20th,
2009
Hiç yorum yok:
Yorum Gönder